大法官解釋 釋字第666號 |
---|
公佈日期:2009/11/06 |
解釋爭點 |
社會秩序維護法第八十條第一項第一款意圖得利與人姦宿處罰鍰規定違憲? |
[51]S. v. Jordan and Others (Sex Workers Education and Advocacy Task Force and Others as Amici Curiae (CCT31/01) [2002] ZACC 22; 2002 (6) SA 642; 2002 (11) BCLR 1117 (9 October 2002)2002 (6) SA 642 (CC). Available at ![]() [52]南非性犯罪防制法第20條第1項第aA款規定:「任何人意圖得利而與他人從事非法的性交或猥褻行為者為構成犯罪行為」(any person…who has unlawful carnal intercourse, or commits an act of indecency, with any other person for reward…shall be guilty of an offence)。違反此項規定者,處三年以下有期徒刑,得併科南非蘭特(Rand)6000元以下之罰金。 [53]S. v. Jordan and Others, at paras. 18-19. [54]S. v. Jordan and Others, at paras. 10, 15. [55]See Jennifer Simpson, Stereotyping Sex Workers: S. v. Jordan and Others, Paper summitted to the 2009 John and Mary Yaremko Forum on Multiculturalism and Human Rights: Student Symposium on Women’s Human Rights, University of Toronto, Faculty of Law, March 6, 2009. Available at ![]() [56]S. v. Jordan and Others, at para. 16. [57]S. v. Jordan and Others, at para. 16. [58]S. v. Jordan and Others, at para. 19. [59]參照南非憲法法院由法官O’Regan及Sachs共同主筆,副首席法官Langa、法官Ackermann及Goldstone共同連署之少數意見書,S. v. Jordan and Others, at para. 63. [60]學者批評前述南非憲法法院判決,亦認為不論多數意見或少數意見,仍有將「性」視為神聖化,將女性從事性行為之目的以此區分均有不當,see Elsje Bonthuys, Womens Sexuality in the South African Constitutional Court, 14 Fem. L. Stu. 391, at 400-402 (2006);何春蕤,前揭註36文,頁216。 [61]S. v. Jordan and Others, at para. 74. [62]S. v. Jordan and Others, at para. 68. [63]S. v. Jordan and Others, at paras. 64, 67. 實際上,此種污名化的原因是性交易行為成為女性得自主決定其性關係,而與傳統上女性之性關係須於婚姻、家庭、繁衍後代等「固有性行為」(civil sex)之目的不符,see Nicole Fritz, Crossing Jordan: Constitutional Space for (un)Civil Sex?, 20 South African Journal for Human Rights 230, at 238 (2004). [64]兩者差別或僅屬程度上之不同,see Law, Commercial Sex, supra note 24, at 553-554; 並見陳宜中,前揭註23文,頁8-12。 [65]相關說明可見夏鑄九主持,性產業與性交易政策之研究期末報告,前揭註44,頁96以下。 |
< 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 > |
填單諮詢
最新考試專區