大法官解釋 釋字第737號 |
|---|
| 公佈日期：20160429 |
| 解釋爭點 |
| 依刑事訴訟法第三十三條第一項、第一百零一條第三項規定，犯罪嫌疑人及其辯護人於偵查中羈押審查程序得從而獲知之卷證資訊，僅為聲請羈押事由所依據之事實，是否合憲？ |
| 【註腳】 [1]http://law.e-gov.go.jp/htmldata/S21/S21KE000.html, last visited: April 25, 2016. [2]http://law.e-gov.go.jp/cgi-bin/idxselect.cgi?IDX_OPT=2&H_NAME=&H_NAME_YOMI=%82%af&H_NO_GENGO=H&H_NO_YEAR=&H_NO_TYPE=2&H_NO_NO=&H_FILE_NAME=S23HO131&H_RYAKU=1&H_CTG=1&H_YOMI_GUN=1&H_CTG_GUN=1, last visited: April 25, 2016. [3]同上註。 [4]同上註。 [5]同上註。 [6]同上註。 [7]Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure of the United States of America, Discovery and Inspection (d)(1) provides that: ‘(d) Regulating Discovery. (1) Protective and Modifying Orders. At any time the court may, for good cause, deny, restrict, or defer discovery or inspection, or grant other appropriate relief. The court may permit a party to show good cause by a written statement that the court will inspect ex parte. If relief is granted, the court must preserve the entire text of the party’s statement under seal.’ Available at: http://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title18/title18a/node35&edition=prelim, last visited: April 21, 2016. [8]我國刑事訴訟法規定證人得拒絕證言之情形，參見第一百七十九條至第一百八十一條及第一百八十二條。 |
| < 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 > |
填單諮詢
最新活動