大法官解釋 釋字第718號 |
|---|
| 公佈日期：2014/03/21 |
| 解釋爭點 |
| 集會遊行法申請許可規定未排除緊急性及偶發性集會遊行之部分，違憲？ |
| 註九：Principle 5: (2) The law should affirm a presumption in favor of holding assemblies. Those seeking to assemble should not be required to obtain permission to do so. (a) Where advance notification is required, notification rules should not be so onerous as to amount to a requirement of permission or to result in arbitrary denial. (b) The law should allow for spontaneous assembly, as an exception to the notification requirement, where the giving of notice is impracticable. (3) The law should allow for simultaneous assemblies or counter-demonstrations, while recognizing the governmental responsibility to protect peaceful assemblies and participants in them.(4) Interference with freedom of assembly can only be justified where it is in conformity with the law and necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security or public safety, public order (ordre public), the protection of public health or morals or the protection of the rights and freedoms of others. 註十：其原文為："Citizens shall be guaranteed the right to peacefully assemble without prior approval, subject to prior notification of the competent authorities."見http://legislationline.org/documents/action/popup/id/4163. 註十一：見本席於釋字第六九二號、第六九三號、第六九六號、第六九七號、第六九九號、第七Ｏ二號、第七Ｏ九號、第七一一號、七一六號解釋提出之意見書之闡述。 |
| < 40 41 42 43 44 45 |
填單諮詢
最新活動